↓ Skip to main content

Common primary tumours of the abdomen and pelvis and their patterns of tumour spread as seen on multi-detector computed tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Common primary tumours of the abdomen and pelvis and their patterns of tumour spread as seen on multi-detector computed tomography
Published in
Insights into Imaging, April 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13244-011-0089-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nyree Griffin, Christopher Burke, Lee Alexander Grant

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) has become the main investigation of choice for staging of many cancers. AIM: The purpose of this pictorial review is to discuss the imaging appearances on CT of some of the more common cancers arising within the abdomen and pelvis and to describe their typical sites of local, nodal and haematogenous tumour spread. METHODS: Cancers arising from the stomach, pancreas, colon, kidney, ovary and prostate will be reviewed. RESULTS: Awareness of the characteristic sites of tumour spread is important to allow accurate identification of all sites of disease. CONCLUSION: This will clearly have an impact on both patient management and prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Unknown 36 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 26%
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#19,015,393
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#797
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,711
of 112,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.