| Title |
Current use of inotropes in circulatory shock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00806-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas W. L. Scheeren, Jan Bakker, Thomas Kaufmann, Djillali Annane, Pierre Asfar, E. Christiaan Boerma, Maurizio Cecconi, Michelle S. Chew, Bernard Cholley, Maria Cronhjort, Daniel De Backer, Arnaldo Dubin, Martin W. Dünser, Jacques Duranteau, Anthony C. Gordon, Ludhmila A. Hajjar, Olfa Hamzaoui, Glenn Hernandez, Vanina Kanoore Edul, Geert Koster, Giovanni Landoni, Marc Leone, Bruno Levy, Claude Martin, Alexandre Mebazaa, Xavier Monnet, Andrea Morelli, Didier Payen, Rupert M. Pearse, Michael R. Pinsky, Peter Radermacher, Daniel A. Reuter, Yasser Sakr, Michael Sander, Bernd Saugel, Mervyn Singer, Pierre Squara, Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Philippe Vignon, Jean-Louis Vincent, Iwan C. C. van der Horst, Simon T. Vistisen, Jean-Louis Teboul |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 144 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 21 | 15% |
| Colombia | 8 | 6% |
| Italy | 8 | 6% |
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 4 | 3% |
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 58 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 115 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 10% |
| Scientists | 9 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 175 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 10% |
| Professor | 15 | 9% |
| Researcher | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 62 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 66 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2022.
All research outputs
#514,416
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#50
of 1,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,084
of 532,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#4
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.