Title |
Determinants of Readiness for Primary Care-Mental Health Integration (PC-MHI) in the VA Health Care System
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, October 2012
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11606-012-2217-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Evelyn T. Chang, Danielle E. Rose, Elizabeth M. Yano, Kenneth B. Wells, Maureen E. Metzger, Edward P. Post, Martin L. Lee, Lisa V. Rubenstein |
Abstract |
Depression management can be challenging for primary care (PC) settings. While several evidence-based models exist for depression care, little is known about the relationships between PC practice characteristics, model characteristics, and the practice's choices regarding model adoption. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 130 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 17% |
Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
Researcher | 19 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 31 | 23% |
Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 25% |
Social Sciences | 22 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 12% |
Psychology | 17 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 9% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#17,231,512
of 25,302,890 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#6,318
of 8,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,447
of 181,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#46
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,302,890 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,148 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.