Title |
Carbon footprint analysis through constructing a multi-region input–output table: a case study of Japan
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Economic Structures, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40008-015-0015-6 |
Authors |
Ryoji Hasegawa, Shigemi Kagawa, Makiko Tsukui |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 19% |
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 19 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 14 | 22% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 10% |
Engineering | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Energy | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Structures
#19
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,801
of 279,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Structures
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,828 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them