↓ Skip to main content

Multi-modal imaging of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
Title
Multi-modal imaging of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder
Published in
Insights into Imaging, April 2016
DOI 10.1007/s13244-016-0491-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcello Zappia, Francesco Di Pietto, Alberto Aliprandi, Simona Pozza, Paola De Petro, Alessandro Muda, Luca Maria Sconfienza

Abstract

Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder is a clinical condition characterized by progressive limitation of active and passive mobility of the glenohumeral joint, generally associated with high levels of pain. Although the diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis is based mainly on clinical examination, different imaging modalities including arthrography, ultrasound, magnetic resonance, and magnetic resonance arthrography may help to confirm the diagnosis, detecting a number of findings such as capsular and coracohumeral ligament thickening, poor capsular distension, extracapsular contrast leakage, and synovial hypertrophy and scar tissue formation at the rotator interval. Ultrasound can also be used to guide intra- and periarticular procedures for treating patients with adhesive capsulitis. • Diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis is mainly based on clinical findings. • Imaging may be used to exclude articular or rotator cuff pathology. • Thickening of coracohumeral and inferior glenohumeral ligaments are common findings. • Rotator interval fat pad obliteration has 100 % specificity for adhesive capsulitis. • Ultrasound can be used to guide intra- and periarticular treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 144 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 48 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 1%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Sports and Recreations 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 55 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2019.
All research outputs
#13,819,162
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#532
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,718
of 303,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.