| Title |
Higher anticoagulation targets and risk of thrombotic events in severe COVID-19 patients: bi-center cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-021-00809-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Helms, François Severac, Hamid Merdji, Maleka Schenck, Raphaël Clere-Jehl, Mathieu Baldacini, Mickaël Ohana, Lélia Grunebaum, Vincent Castelain, Eduardo Anglés-Cano, Laurent Sattler, Ferhat Meziani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 5 | 63% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 30% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 48 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#6,528,127
of 23,275,636 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#609
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,917
of 505,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,275,636 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.