↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic classification based on P/F and PEEP in invasively ventilated ICU patients with hypoxemia—insights from the MARS study

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Prognostic classification based on P/F and PEEP in invasively ventilated ICU patients with hypoxemia—insights from the MARS study
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40635-020-00334-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabienne D. Simonis, Laura R. A. Schouten, Olaf L. Cremer, David S. Y. Ong, Gabriele Amoruso, Gilda Cinella, Marcus J. Schultz, Lieuwe D. Bos

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 29%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Psychology 1 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,679,788
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#376
of 458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#428,443
of 502,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#17
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 458 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 502,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.