↓ Skip to main content

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-producing malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: a rare case

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Case Reports, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor-producing malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: a rare case
Published in
Surgical Case Reports, January 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40792-021-01113-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimihisa Mizoguchi, Kazuhisa Kaneshiro, Makoto Kubo, Yoshihiko Sadakari, Yoshizo Kimura, Koichi Higaki, Toshiro Ogata, Masahiko Taniguchi

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Computer Science 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2021.
All research outputs
#16,103,298
of 20,034,281 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Case Reports
#96
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#295,922
of 404,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Case Reports
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,034,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 404,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them