↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous biosorption of nickel and cadmium by the brown algae Cystoseria indica characterized by isotherm and kinetic models

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biological Chemistry, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Simultaneous biosorption of nickel and cadmium by the brown algae Cystoseria indica characterized by isotherm and kinetic models
Published in
Applied Biological Chemistry, November 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13765-019-0477-6
Authors

Mohammad Khajavian, David A. Wood, Ahmad Hallajsani, Nasrollah Majidian

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Master 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 30 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Chemical Engineering 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 28 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#16,291,311
of 23,999,200 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biological Chemistry
#66
of 72 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,496
of 361,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biological Chemistry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,999,200 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 72 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them