↓ Skip to main content

Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and unburned mixed-conifer forests of the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA)

Overview of attention for article published in Fire Ecology, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Long-term surface fuel accumulation in burned and unburned mixed-conifer forests of the Central and Southern Sierra Nevada, CA (USA)
Published in
Fire Ecology, June 2006
DOI 10.4996/fireecology.0201053
Authors

MaryBeth Keifer, Jan W. van Wagtendonk, Monica Buhler

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 36 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Other 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 35%
Engineering 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,642,184
of 23,270,775 outputs
Outputs from Fire Ecology
#111
of 191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,939
of 65,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fire Ecology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,270,775 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them