↓ Skip to main content

DNA damage in different Eisenia andrei coelomocytes sub-populations after in vitro exposure to hydrogen peroxide

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
DNA damage in different Eisenia andrei coelomocytes sub-populations after in vitro exposure to hydrogen peroxide
Published in
SpringerPlus, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-1950-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Mincarelli, Costantino Vischetti, John Craft, Luca Tiano

Abstract

Earthworms play an essential role in providing soil fertility and may represent an important soil contamination bio-indicator. They are able to ingest soil particles, adsorb substances throughout the intestinal epithelium into the coelomic cavity, where chemicals can come in direct contact with coelomic fluid. Earthworm coelomic fluid shelters leucocytes (coelomocytes) that differ significantly both structurally and functionally. Cellular variability could lead to different susceptibility towards contaminants possibly present in soil ecosystem. In order to define population specific dose response to chemicals and to identify a homogeneous cell population to be used as a relevant biomarker, we investigated different coelomocytes subpopulation, obtained by Percoll density gradient centrifugation (5-35 %), exposed ex vivo to H2O2 in the range of concentration 15-120 µM. DNA damage levels were assessed by the comet assay on unseparated coelomocytes and on three enriched cellular fractions (light, medium and heavy density subpopulations). All tested samples showed a dose-response genotoxic effect following H2O2 exposure. Moreover, light density sub-population appeared more susceptible to oxidative insult highlighted by a significant increase in DNA damage indexes at lower concentrations of H2O2. Present data suggested that in these experimental condition coelomocytes light fraction may represent a more sensitive biomarker of genotoxic insult.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 14%
Environmental Science 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 8 29%