| Title |
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gynecological Surgery, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10397-016-0930-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geertje Callewaert, Jan Bosteels, Susanne Housmans, Jasper Verguts, Ben Van Cleynenbreugel, Frank Van der Aa, Dirk De Ridder, Ignace Vergote, Jan Deprest |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 25 | 25% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 51% |
| Engineering | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,105,299
of 23,773,220 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#10
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,463
of 400,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,773,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them