↓ Skip to main content

Abdominal cerclage after failed transvaginal cervical cerclage

Overview of attention for article published in Gynecological Surgery, July 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 160)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Abdominal cerclage after failed transvaginal cervical cerclage
Published in
Gynecological Surgery, July 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10397-011-0691-7
Authors

Anwar Moria, Nouf Aljaji, Louise Miner, Togas Tulandi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Researcher 2 17%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 2 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 2 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,641,993
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Gynecological Surgery
#42
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,125
of 116,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gynecological Surgery
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.