| Title |
European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13244-020-00947-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stefan Wirth, Julian Hebebrand, Raffaella Basilico, Ferco H. Berger, Ana Blanco, Cem Calli, Maureen Dumba, Ulrich Linsenmaier, Fabian Mück, Konraad H. Nieboer, Mariano Scaglione, Marc-André Weber, Elizabeth Dick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 14 | 61% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Austria | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 14 | 18% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 44% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 23 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,221,179
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#107
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,588
of 515,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.