↓ Skip to main content

Selection and validation of a classification system for a child-centred preference-based measure of oral health-related quality of life specific to dental caries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 516)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Selection and validation of a classification system for a child-centred preference-based measure of oral health-related quality of life specific to dental caries
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, December 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41687-020-00268-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helen J. Rogers, Fiona Gilchrist, Zoe Marshman, Helen D. Rodd, Donna Rowen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 17%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Lecturer 1 4%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 35%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 11 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,011,643
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#42
of 516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,865
of 508,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.