| Title |
Microbial degradation of petrochemical waste-polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bioresources and Bioprocessing, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40643-017-0158-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. H. Fulekar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 24 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 6 | 6% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,640,263
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#28
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,523
of 315,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bioresources and Bioprocessing
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.