Title |
Endotoxemia and circulating bacteriome in severe COVID-19 patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, December 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00362-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Phatadon Sirivongrangson, Win Kulvichit, Sunchai Payungporn, Trairak Pisitkun, Ariya Chindamporn, Sadudee Peerapornratana, Prapaporn Pisitkun, Suwalak Chitcharoen, Vorthon Sawaswong, Navaporn Worasilchai, Sarinya Kampunya, Opass Putcharoen, Thammasak Thawitsri, Nophol Leelayuwatanakul, Napplika Kongpolprom, Vorakamol Phoophiboon, Thitiwat Sriprasart, Rujipat Samransamruajkit, Somkanya Tungsanga, Kanitha Tiankanon, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Asada Leelahavanichkul, Tueboon Sriphojanart, Terapong Tantawichien, Usa Thisyakorn, Chintana Chirathaworn, Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa, Kriang Tungsanga, Somchai Eiam-Ong, Visith Sitprija, John A. Kellum, Nattachai Srisawat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Sweden | 1 | 5% |
Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
Japan | 1 | 5% |
India | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 79% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Other | 6 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 20% |
Unknown | 24 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 14 | 17% |
Unknown | 27 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,911,235
of 25,838,141 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#52
of 553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,070
of 530,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,838,141 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.