| Title |
Preparation and preclinical evaluation of a 68Ga-labelled c(RGDfK) conjugate comprising the bifunctional chelator NODIA-Me
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry, May 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41181-018-0043-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tilman Läppchen, Jason P. Holland, Yvonne Kiefer, Mark D. Bartholomä |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 21% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 14% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#8,257,025
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry
#33
of 107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,332
of 331,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them