↓ Skip to main content

Toxicities of docetaxel: original drug versus generics—a comparative study about 81 cases

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Toxicities of docetaxel: original drug versus generics—a comparative study about 81 cases
Published in
SpringerPlus, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2351-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Choukri Elm’hadi, Rachid Tanz, Mohamed Reda Khmamouche, Mehdi Toreis, Tarik Mahfoud, Khaoula Alaoui Slimani, Hassan Errihani, Mohammed Ichou

Abstract

Docetaxel is a chemotherapy drug widely prescribed in oncology that recognizes a variety of manufactured generics whose toxicity is increasingly reported. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicities between the original and a generics docetaxel in a Moroccan center. In a cross sectional study, we enrolled patients treated with docetaxel from the oncology department of the military hospital of Rabat over a period of 2 years (2013-2014). We compared the prevalence of hypersensitivity reactions, febrile neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, gastrointestinal, cutaneous, and hematologic toxicities, between four different presentations of docetaxel including the original drug. Only grade II or worse adverse events related to chemotherapy were considered. Treatments discontinuations due to toxicity were also compared. Unusual skin toxicities were included. 81 patients were eligible for analysis [43/generics arm vs. 38/original drug arm. Hematological toxicity was significantly more frequent in the generic arm than in the original drug (32.6 vs. 13.2 %; p = 0.04)]. Also, a signifying higher rate of treatment discontinuation was observed in the generic arm (39.5 vs. 7.9 %, p = 0.001). The use of specific generic increase numerically the skin toxicities (17.6 vs. 0 %, p = 0.026). Our data suggest that generics of docetaxel are associated with an increase of hematological and cutaneous toxicities, an increase of treatment discontinuation rate and emphasize the need of a regulation of generics' manufacture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Psychology 2 7%
Chemistry 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 9 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,989,790
of 22,880,230 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#349
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,981
of 326,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#44
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,880,230 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.