@AmiViruete @davidplenur Son prácticas totalmente seguras y confiables, siempre q se tomen los recaudos necesarios y el equipo adecuado para realizarlas https://t.co/4flseOMsiD. https://t.co/Z3bci5FGDJ en centros donde real
Feasibility, safety, and resource utilisation of active mobilisation of patients on extracorporeal life support: a prospective observational study https://t.co/EuI9uwsTtm
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
Feasibility, safety, and resource utilisation of active mobilisation of patients on extracorporeal life support: a prospective study - PubMed Impressive labor intensive work- subclavian access SO much easier #ICURehab @WesElyMD https://t.co/LiGi4ozfc7
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
RT @georgentou1: Great to see this work - real life feasibility of early mobility with a wide array of VV and VA ECMO patients. I am a bit…
RT @nbs0115: Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全…
Mobilization is safe during ECMO treatment. Most patients conducted more than sitting at the edge of bed. エクモ治療中でも端座位以上の離床を安全にできるようです。エクモ中の離床が安全な事はほぼ確立したように感じます! https://t.co/wJUWRZtZUf
RT @georgentou1: Great to see this work - real life feasibility of early mobility with a wide array of VV and VA ECMO patients. I am a bit…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @georgentou1: Great to see this work - real life feasibility of early mobility with a wide array of VV and VA ECMO patients. I am a bit…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
Great to see this work - real life feasibility of early mobility with a wide array of VV and VA ECMO patients. I am a bit surprised that only 3-4 clinicians needed. This may vary in different centres.
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @JenelleBadulak: Love this!! https://t.co/xbSD8VT4z3
Love this!!
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
This is mobilization at its best- in the most challenging patients. Well done
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
RT @NydahlPeter: Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 mi…
Out-of-bed mobilization of 43 patients on extracorporeal life support was feasible in 332 sessions; median duration 130 min., involving 3 team members. Safety events in 7% vs 15% in non-mobilized pts. Teamwork! https://t.co/WynuuX4ycf
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
RT @NydahlPeter: Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible;…
Active out-of-bed mobilisation in 43/115 ICU patients on extracorporeal life support incl 334 mobilizations were feasible; median duration 130 min, 3-4 clinicians needed; safety events happened in 7% vs 15% in non-mobilized pts. Teamwork! https://t.co/FhP