| Title |
Feasibility, safety, and resource utilisation of active mobilisation of patients on extracorporeal life support: a prospective observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-020-00776-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephan Braune, Patrick Bojes, Anne Mecklenburg, Federico Angriman, Gerold Soeffker, Katja Warnke, Dirk Westermann, Stefan Blankenberg, Mathias Kubik, Hermann Reichenspurner, Stefan Kluge |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 18% |
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Japan | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 27% |
| Scientists | 2 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 19% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,908,953
of 24,503,376 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#233
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,992
of 518,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,503,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.