| Title |
Prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients in surgical intensive care unit by pleth variability index and inferior vena cava diameter
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42077-020-00097-4 |
| Authors |
Diaaeldin Badr Metwally Kotb Aboelnile, Mohamed Ismail Abdelfattah Elseidy, Yasir Ahmed Elbasiony Mohamed Kenawey, Ibrahim Mohammed Alsayed Ahmed Elsherif |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 38% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 168. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2020.
All research outputs
#206,979
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
#1
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,689
of 415,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ain-Shams Journal of Anesthesiology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one scored the same or higher as 37 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them