↓ Skip to main content

Risk factors and influence of carbapenem exposure on the development of carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections and infections at sterile sites

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors and influence of carbapenem exposure on the development of carbapenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections and infections at sterile sites
Published in
SpringerPlus, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40064-016-2438-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle A. Barron, Kris Richardson, Meghan Jeffres, Bruce McCollister

Abstract

Patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections from blood or sterile sites were evaluated to determine risk factors associated with carbapenem resistance (CRPA) compared to carbapenem sensitivity (CSPA) as well as prior carbapenem use and the development of resistance. Retrospective chart review of 80 patients hospitalized with a documented P. aeruginosa infection during 2010-2011. Stored isolates were retested with both Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and E-tests. Clinical characteristic of patients in the CRPA (N = 21) and the CSPA (N = 59) groups were similar. Hospital acquired (HA) infections were more common in the CRPA group compared to the CSPA group (71 vs 44 %, p = 0.04) and CRPA patients were more likely to have a Foley catheter at the time of infection (71 vs 37 %, p = 0.01). There was more carbapenem use in the CRPA group prior to onset of infection (59 vs 22 %, OR 5.1, 95 % CI 1.3-20.8, p = 0.01). Length of stay was significantly longer in the CRPA group (mean 44 days) compared to the CSPA group (mean 23 days), p = 0.02. Mortality between the two groups was similar and there were no differences between groups for death attributable to Pseudomonas. Patients with CRPA were more likely to have HA infections and to have a multidrug resistant profile. Other identifiable risks included a Foley catheter in place at the time of infection and exposure to a carbapenem prior to infection. Prompt removal of devices and judicious use of antibiotics may be interventions that can impact the development of this kind of infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Other 5 23%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#731
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,290
of 368,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#103
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.