↓ Skip to main content

Measuring financial literacy with a Situational Judgement Test: do some groups really perform worse or is it the measuring instrument?

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Measuring financial literacy with a Situational Judgement Test: do some groups really perform worse or is it the measuring instrument?
Published in
Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40461-020-00103-x
Authors

Eveline Wuttke, Christin Siegfried, Carmela Aprea

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 9 12%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 37 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Arts and Humanities 4 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 39 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
#111
of 141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#322,604
of 516,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.