↓ Skip to main content

Heat and fraud: evaluating how room temperature influences fraud likelihood

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Heat and fraud: evaluating how room temperature influences fraud likelihood
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00261-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huanxu Liu, Jingwen Yang, Yuki Yamada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 4 15%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 5 19%
Psychology 4 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,391,436
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#234
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#238,145
of 522,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#14
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 522,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.