↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the outcome of classic laminectomy surgery alone versus laminectomy with fixation surgery in patients with lumbar canal stenosis regarding improvement of pain and function

Overview of attention for article published in Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Evaluating the outcome of classic laminectomy surgery alone versus laminectomy with fixation surgery in patients with lumbar canal stenosis regarding improvement of pain and function
Published in
Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery, July 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41984-020-00087-6
Authors

Mohamed A. El Tabl, Yasser B. El Sisi, Saeed E. Al Emam, Mohamed A. Hussen, Dalia S. Saif

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,540,769
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
#6
of 30 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,490
of 430,133 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,133 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them