↓ Skip to main content

Emerging good practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Emerging good practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) measures
Published in
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s41687-018-0035-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Acquadro, Donald L. Patrick, Sonya Eremenco, Mona L. Martin, Dagmara Kuliś, Helena Correia, Katrin Conway, on behalf of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Translation and Cultural Adaptation Special Interest Group (TCA-SIG)

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 5%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#370
of 677 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,622
of 348,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 677 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.