| Title |
Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41235-020-00255-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raechel N. Soicher, Kathryn A. Becker-Blease, Keiko C. P. Bostwick |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 22% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 83 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Psychology | 10 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 37 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,077,261
of 25,866,425 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#62
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,527
of 442,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,866,425 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.