↓ Skip to main content

Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
38 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms
Published in
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, November 2020
DOI 10.1186/s41235-020-00255-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raechel N. Soicher, Kathryn A. Becker-Blease, Keiko C. P. Bostwick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 10%
Lecturer 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 29 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 13%
Social Sciences 10 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 36 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,039,325
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#62
of 365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,990
of 439,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.