RT @EileenMHunt: A computer science paper that is eerily in line with the thesis of my most recent book, 'Artificial Life After #Frankenste…
RT @EileenMHunt: A computer science paper that is eerily in line with the thesis of my most recent book, 'Artificial Life After #Frankenste…
RT @EileenMHunt: A computer science paper that is eerily in line with the thesis of my most recent book, 'Artificial Life After #Frankenste…
A computer science paper that is eerily in line with the thesis of my most recent book, 'Artificial Life After #Frankenstein': Future #AI , on Turing's model in "Computing Machinery and Intelligence," might be trained to study political theory: https://t.c
@SpringerOpen shares this article on an AI #politicaltheory. 'His prescience brings to the foreground the yet unsolved problem of how humans might teach or shape AIs to behave in ways that align with moral standards' Read more below ⭐️ https://t.co/HagHhlC
RT @gemmamilne: A paper on teaching AI morals by feeding in classical political theory (Aristotle, Machiavelli, Aurelius, Locke etc) The…
Still thinking about this. Like, is there such thing as 'innocent AI research' like this? 'I was just looking at this method, the texts are irrelevant right now'....or should we be holding to account every piece of research which explores / says it's exp
RT @gemmamilne: A paper on teaching AI morals by feeding in classical political theory (Aristotle, Machiavelli, Aurelius, Locke etc) The…
A paper on teaching AI morals by feeding in classical political theory (Aristotle, Machiavelli, Aurelius, Locke etc) The focus is a particular method to extract topics...but, again, the question is not 'can we teach morals to AI' but: 'based on what?' ht