| Title |
Recycling of waste and downgrading of secondary resources in a classical type of production model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Economic Structures, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2193-2409-1-7 |
| Authors |
Eiji B Hosoda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 3 | 25% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 17% |
| Energy | 2 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2012.
All research outputs
#20,166,700
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Structures
#75
of 86 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,030
of 169,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Structures
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 86 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.