Title |
The Pap smear screening as an occasion for smoking cessation and physical activity counselling: effectiveness of the SPRINT randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, September 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-740 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Giuseppe Gorini, Giulia Carreras, Livia Giordano, Emanuela Anghinoni, Anna Iossa, Alessandro Coppo, Fiorella Talassi, Maurizio Galavotti, Elisabetta Chellini |
Abstract |
The organized Cervical Cancer Screening Programme (CCSP) in Italy might represent an occasion to deliver smoking cessation (SC) counselling to women attending the Pap test examination. Evidence of effectiveness of physical activity (PA) promotion and intervention in adjunct to SC counselling is not strong.Objective of the SPRINT trial was to evaluate the effectiveness of a standard SC counselling intervention delivered by trained midwives in the CCSP, and whether the adjunct of a PA counselling to the SC counselling might increase quit rates. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 18% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 9% |
Researcher | 8 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 25 | 22% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 28% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 13% |
Psychology | 7 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#6,007,020
of 22,678,224 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,165
of 14,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,229
of 169,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#106
of 332 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,678,224 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 332 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.