↓ Skip to main content

Imaging features and differential diagnoses of non-neoplastic diffuse mediastinal diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
Title
Imaging features and differential diagnoses of non-neoplastic diffuse mediastinal diseases
Published in
Insights into Imaging, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13244-020-00909-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavian Tabotta, Gilbert R. Ferretti, Helmut Prosch, Samia Boussouar, Anne-Laure Brun, Justus E. Roos, Lukas Ebner, Igor Letovanec, Michel Brauner, Catherine Beigelman-Aubry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Other 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 8 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 67%
Unknown 9 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,454,538
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#729
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,664
of 419,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#21
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.