↓ Skip to main content

Androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis haploids in cucurbit species

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell Reports, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis haploids in cucurbit species
Published in
Plant Cell Reports, July 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00299-016-2018-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan-Qi Dong, Wei-Xing Zhao, Xiao-Hui Li, Xi-Cun Liu, Ning-Ning Gao, Jin-Hua Huang, Wen-Ying Wang, Xiao-Li Xu, Zhen-Hai Tang

Abstract

Haploids and doubled haploids are critical components of plant breeding. This review is focused on studies on haploids and double haploids inducted in cucurbits through in vitro pollination with irradiated pollen, unfertilized ovule/ovary culture, and anther/microspore culture during the last 30 years, as well as comprehensive analysis of the main factors of each process and comparison between chromosome doubling and ploidy identification methods, with special focus on the application of double haploids in plant breeding and genetics. This review identifies existing problems affecting the efficiency of androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis in cucurbit species. Donor plant genotypes and surrounding environments, developmental stages of explants, culture media, stress factors, and chromosome doubling and ploidy identification are compared at length and discussed as methodologies and protocols for androgenesis, gynogenesis, and parthenogenesis in haploid and double haploid production technologies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 22%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 72%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Unspecified 3 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2019.
All research outputs
#7,146,324
of 13,226,239 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell Reports
#958
of 1,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,083
of 261,085 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell Reports
#14
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,226,239 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,595 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,085 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.