↓ Skip to main content

Persistent swallowing disorders after extubation in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: a two-center prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Persistent swallowing disorders after extubation in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU: a two-center prospective study
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00752-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Beduneau, V. Souday, J. C. Richard, J. F. Hamel, D. Carpentier, J. M. Chretien, P. Bouchetemble, L. Laccoureye, A. Astier, V. Tanguy, A. Mercat, F. Beloncle, F. Tamion

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Other 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 12 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 10 31%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,697,941
of 25,189,292 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#571
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,300
of 423,562 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#19
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,189,292 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,562 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.