↓ Skip to main content

Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Biased and unbiased estimation of the average length of stay in intensive care units in the Covid-19 pandemic
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00749-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nathanael Lapidus, Xianlong Zhou, Fabrice Carrat, Bruno Riou, Yan Zhao, Gilles Hejblum

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 13%
Other 10 12%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 31 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Computer Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 30 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,069,627
of 25,028,065 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#121
of 1,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,991
of 423,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,028,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,161 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,935 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.