↓ Skip to main content

Modeling fire ignition probability and frequency using Hurdle models: a cross-regional study in Southern Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Processes, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Modeling fire ignition probability and frequency using Hurdle models: a cross-regional study in Southern Europe
Published in
Ecological Processes, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13717-020-00263-4
Authors

Marina D’Este, Antonio Ganga, Mario Elia, Raffaella Lovreglio, Vincenzo Giannico, Giuseppina Spano, Giuseppe Colangelo, Raffaele Lafortezza, Giovanni Sanesi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 11 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 19%
Engineering 5 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2021.
All research outputs
#16,490,096
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Processes
#111
of 264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,032
of 420,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Processes
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.