↓ Skip to main content

INACT—INDECT Advanced Image Cataloguing Tool

Overview of attention for article published in Multimedia Tools and Applications, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
INACT—INDECT Advanced Image Cataloguing Tool
Published in
Multimedia Tools and Applications, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11042-012-1164-3
Authors

Michał Grega, Damian Bryk, Maciej Napora

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 16%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 10 53%
Social Sciences 4 21%
Psychology 2 11%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#15,682,052
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#907
of 4,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,681
of 166,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools and Applications
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.