↓ Skip to main content

INACT—INDECT Advanced Image Cataloguing Tool

Overview of attention for article published in Multimedia Tools & Applications, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 102)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
INACT—INDECT Advanced Image Cataloguing Tool
Published in
Multimedia Tools & Applications, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11042-012-1164-3
Authors

Michał Grega, Damian Bryk, Maciej Napora

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Computer Science 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2013.
All research outputs
#1,806,615
of 3,633,617 outputs
Outputs from Multimedia Tools & Applications
#27
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,329
of 75,065 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Multimedia Tools & Applications
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,633,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,065 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them