Spectral signature of recent climate change (2016 paper) https://t.co/MWH8RJoTsl
@balkraix @jo_mobley11 @vcdxnz001 @ed_hawkins No amount of evidence is going to get through to that sort of denialist. The predictions of greenhouse-gas-induced AGW have been confirmed for decades. They're just never going to admit it. https://t.co/El5XM
@hansvvz @klimaatVeranda @Tim_Bleeker @lucasbergkamp @Clintel @milieudefensie @Shell @frantecol @GuidovanderWerf Lees verder hier, over deze directe satelliet-waarnemingen van het (verstrekte) broeikaseffect door o.a. CO2: https://t.co/0h3fbJFQSy
@hansvvz @klimaatVeranda @Tim_Bleeker @lucasbergkamp @Clintel @milieudefensie @Shell @frantecol @GuidovanderWerf Het plaatje dat jij post, komt helemaal niet uit het 'stuk' waar ik het over heb. Heeft er zelfs niets mee te maken. Ik had het tich over: htt
@hansvvz @klimaatVeranda @Tim_Bleeker @lucasbergkamp @Clintel @milieudefensie @Shell @frantecol @GuidovanderWerf De absorptie van de uitgaande langgolvige warmtestraling door CO2, H2O, O3 etc. https://t.co/KQt87FnEC5 https://t.co/f5MwbXb5o6
@GildasMcmurty @PeterDClack If you want something more empirical, here you go. https://t.co/OCeG5ugyz0 And: https://t.co/t2WMyX7LSn
@t_ftop @pjcadams @MelbaMo47930710 @SparksPlan @LukeWarfordTX You are making nonsense assertions that fly in the face of science: https://t.co/OnCKwoEFgX
@mckenziecahoun @TomPlesier @hausfath OK @mckenziecahoun, I'll go with the first Google search result for "signature of global warning in satellite observation". Here it is: https://t.co/1OHRgimNQ3 . I doublecheck, you did not exclude review articles.
—"half of the Earth's Outgoing Long-wave Radiation... [where water vapor and clouds] critically influence the Earth's radiation budget and climate... has never been measured" 🤓 https://t.co/uohLvQL6x6
@19Titus72 @ChattyAvocado @MFrauchigerSVP Diverse Messungen belegen die signifikante Verstärkung des natürlichen Treibhauseffekts. https://t.co/MjsJVU9NFy https://t.co/UevgjKwvRy
«Indeed, we would contend that there is currently no hyperspectral instrument in space that possesses the level of in-orbit, SI traceable calibration or sampling characteristics needed to provide a benchmark record of the true climate state.» https://t.co
RT @crentsch: @garbowski_mazi The final stop is reading the excellent summary article "The Spectral Signature of Climate Recent Change" by…
@StrubEdgar @MartinCJanssen @joenuc Satellitendaten und auch Messungen von der Erdoberfläche aus belegen, dass der massive Ausstoss von Treibhausgasen, den natürlichen Treibhauseffekt in den letzten Jahrzehnten signifikant verstärkt hat. https://t.co/D44gD
@__Robin__Hood_ 5.) Satellitendaten und auch Messungen von der Erdoberfläche aus belegen, dass der massive Ausstoss von Treibhausgasen, den natürlichen Treibhauseffekt in den letzten Jahrzehnten signifikant verstärkt hat. https://t.co/PNQCFhyOAl https://t.
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @mentalmal1: Correlation does not equal causation.
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
Correlation does not equal causation.
@Lahor_Jakrlin @FrancoisPuerro @alex_baur @Knutti_ETH @C_Althaus @LahorJakrlinOK 2.) Sowohl Satellitendaten als auch Messungen von der Erdoberfläche aus, belegen, dass der massive Ausstoss von Treibhausgasen, den natürlichen Treibhauseffekt in den letzten
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
RT @BubbasRanch: Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer…
Climate Hoax Buster This paper just assumes CO2 causes warming and then proceeds to show warming. And this passed peer review. Because if there is warming it must be due to CO2 even if it has absolutely nothing to do with CO2. FAIL https://t.co/wuO36
@garbowski_mazi The final stop is reading the excellent summary article "The Spectral Signature of Climate Recent Change" by H. Brindley. The model-predicted effects on 🌍's Planck distribution is fig. 2. I've (basically) animated the measurements for this
@hans_denkt @FurbieMiller @schmid_claudio 5.) Satellitendaten und auch Messungen von der Erdoberfläche aus belegen, dass der massive Ausstoss von Treibhausgasen, den natürlichen Treibhauseffekt in den letzten Jahrzehnten signifikant verstärkt hat. https://
@ChartsClimate Re: "We do not understand climate." You misspelled "ClimateCharts does not" as "We do not". Was there a post-1950s multi-decadal stratospheric cooling trend and tropospheric warming trend? https://t.co/kTLVuGaens https://t.co/ncNYsiRYpF
@RalfT7 @ThomiHorath @FedierMichael @JayBadran Anscheinend funktionieren einige Links nicht mehr: → 3.) https://t.co/PNQCFhhdbL
@bullburton @GeraldKutney @FuzzyWuzzyTO He must have me muted.. because I showed him the evidence. https://t.co/i1Wg2MbxfN
@bullburton @GeraldKutney @FuzzyWuzzyTO I posted them here. https://t.co/i1Wg2MbxfN
@bullburton @GeraldKutney The greenhouse effect as been measured by satelites and from back radiation on the ground Review. https://t.co/ZKtTc6cJZs Satellites https://t.co/oB8p30oqGW Backradiation (the correct paper this time) https://t.co/xojaWDryx1
RT @clivehbest: "Seventeen years of AIRS nighttime, cloud-clear OLR measurements reveal 0.358±0.067 Wm−2 additional radiative forcing induc…
"Seventeen years of AIRS nighttime, cloud-clear OLR measurements reveal 0.358±0.067 Wm−2 additional radiative forcing induced by +37 ppm atmospheric CO2."
@LindsayyuleS https://t.co/1y31ju8DOs I will correct my 2nd image with this more up to date study.
@NDPnomore @Ipa60min @YouTube Right on cue: https://t.co/htzs44oB7I