@JdavisWx Re: "I see no evidence" And you're lying again, even after being cited evidence, as per your denialism. Would increased CO2 warm the near-surface and troposphere, while cooling the stratosphere? https://t.co/kTLVuFSDvU https://t.co/olax21M6MG
@JdavisWx @SturmLLiouville Re: ".what was that you were saying about failing in science and thermodynamics again?" Let us know when you finally grasp basic climate science. https://t.co/CE5auMm3N7 https://t.co/kTLVuFSDvU https://t.co/xgXJxZKohG
@EuphoniusNuts @RushhourP @NikolovScience Re: "From Manabe 1975: If true, this mechanism would operate at every level." Nope. Please learn about the topic that you're a denialist about. Here's a hint to get u started: Does that lapse rate have the same s
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "I don't think the first law needs anymore reviewing, little girl" Doesn't address what your beloved Wikipedia told you. https://t.co/CE5auMm3N7
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "Why do you deny a 100% consensus physical law?" When are you going to address the cited evidence, you dumb troll? https://t.co/CE5auMm3N7
@LifeIsThermal @blaubok Re: "Yes. Only heat and work can do it." Why are you still too stupid+dishonest to address the cited evidence? https://t.co/CE5auMm3N7
@Manix_2019 Re: "Because that is the main data can support AGW" The more relevant satellite-based evidence for AGW would be observed changes in the infrared spectrum. And I already had a multi-tweet thread showing evidence of that: https://t.co/CE5auMm3N7