↓ Skip to main content

Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Best-practice IgM- and IgA-enriched immunoglobulin use in patients with sepsis
Published in
Annals of Intensive Care, October 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13613-020-00740-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Axel Nierhaus, Giorgio Berlot, Detlef Kindgen-Milles, Eckhard Müller, Massimo Girardis

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 32 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,014,692
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#741
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,385
of 414,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#31
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 414,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.