↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of the reliability of a non‐invasive elbow valgus laxity measurement device

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Assessment of the reliability of a non‐invasive elbow valgus laxity measurement device
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40634-020-00290-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth Seiber, Chris Bales, Elisabeth Wörner, Thay Lee, Marc R. Safran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 50%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Unknown 3 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 58%
Sports and Recreations 2 17%
Unknown 3 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#14,013,606
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#114
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,228
of 411,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.