| Title |
Water sampling using a drone at Yugama crater lake, Kusatsu-Shirane volcano, Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Earth, Planets and Space, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40623-018-0835-3 |
| Authors |
Akihiko Terada, Yuichi Morita, Takeshi Hashimoto, Toshiya Mori, Takeshi Ohba, Muga Yaguchi, Wataru Kanda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 18 | 25% |
| Engineering | 10 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,886,907
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Earth, Planets and Space
#58
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,835
of 340,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Earth, Planets and Space
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.