↓ Skip to main content

Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) as therapy for cartilage, tendon and muscle damage – German working group position statement

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) as therapy for cartilage, tendon and muscle damage – German working group position statement
Published in
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, September 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40634-020-00282-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Tischer, G. Bode, M. Buhs, B. Marquass, S. Nehrer, S. Vogt, W. Zinser, P. Angele, G. Spahn, G. H. Welsch, P. Niemeyer, H. Madry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Other 3 5%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 31 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Neuroscience 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 32 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,427,356
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#63
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,671
of 397,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.