Title |
Factors affecting aseptic loosening in primary total knee replacements: an in vitro study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40634-020-00243-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David Lionberger, Laura Wattenbarger, Christopher Conlon, Timothy J. Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Researcher | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Materials Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2020.
All research outputs
#15,633,726
of 23,243,271 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#190
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,942
of 398,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,243,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.