The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Title |
Diagnostic characteristics of 11 formulae for calculating corrected flow time as measured by a wearable Doppler patch
|
---|---|
Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental, September 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40635-020-00339-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jon-Émile S. Kenny, Igor Barjaktarevic, David C. Mackenzie, Andrew M. Eibl, Matthew Parrotta, Bradley F. Long, Joseph K. Eibl |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 6 | 17% |
Saudi Arabia | 2 | 6% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
Turkey | 1 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 3% |
Mexico | 1 | 3% |
Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 18 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 24 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 31% |
Scientists | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 17% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 33% |
Engineering | 2 | 17% |
Computer Science | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,614,654
of 25,375,376 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#36
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,215
of 415,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine Experimental
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,375,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.