| Title |
Collection and use of EQ-5D for follow-up, decision-making, and quality improvement in health care - the case of the Swedish National Quality Registries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-020-00231-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivia Ernstsson, Mathieu F. Janssen, Emelie Heintz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Hungary | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 14% |
| Psychology | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,216,926
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#25
of 578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,129
of 380,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.