↓ Skip to main content

CADA—computer-aided DaTSCAN analysis

Overview of attention for article published in EJNMMI Physics, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 181)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
CADA—computer-aided DaTSCAN analysis
Published in
EJNMMI Physics, February 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40658-016-0140-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Augimeri, Andrea Cherubini, Giuseppe Lucio Cascini, Domenico Galea, Maria Eugenia Caligiuri, Gaetano Barbagallo, Gennarina Arabia, Aldo Quattrone

Abstract

Dopamine transporter (DaT) imaging (DaTSCAN) is useful for the differential diagnosis of parkinsonian syndromes. Visual evaluation of DaTSCAN images represents the generally accepted diagnostic method, but it is strongly dependent on the observer's experience and shows inter- and intra-observer variability. A reliable and automatic method for DaTSCAN evaluation can provide objective quantification; it is desirable for longitudinal studies, and it allows for a better follow-up control. Moreover, it is crucial for an automated method to produce coherent measures related to the severity of motor symptoms. In this work, we propose a novel fully automated technique for DaTSCAN analysis that generates quantitative measures based on striatal intensity, shape, symmetry and extent. We tested these measures using a support vector machine (SVM) classifier. The proposed measures reached 100 % accuracy in distinguishing between patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and control subjects. We also demonstrate the existence of a linear relationship and an exponential trend between pooled structural and functional striatal characteristics and the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score. We present a novel, highly reproducible, user-independent technique for DaTSCAN analysis producing quantitative measures directly connected to striatum uptake and shape. In our method, no a priori assumption is required on the spatial conformation and localization of striatum, and both uptake and symmetry contribute to the index quantification. These measures can reliably support a computer-assisted decision system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Czechia 1 2%
Unknown 61 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 32%
Engineering 11 17%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,633
of 22,879,161 outputs
Outputs from EJNMMI Physics
#11
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,238
of 297,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EJNMMI Physics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,879,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them