Title |
Gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography: disadvantages prevail over benefit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Insights into Imaging, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13244-011-0130-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marij J. Frantzen, Simon Robben, Alida A. Postma, Johannes Zoetelief, Joachim E. Wildberger, Gerrit J. Kemerink |
Abstract |
To re-evaluate gonad shielding in paediatric pelvic radiography in terms of attainable radiation risk reduction and associated loss of diagnostic information. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 132 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 26% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 6% |
Other | 21 | 16% |
Unknown | 41 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 19% |
Physics and Astronomy | 14 | 11% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 47 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,504,936
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#66
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,816
of 134,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.