↓ Skip to main content

ESR statement on good scientific practice and publishing

Overview of attention for article published in Insights into Imaging, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
ESR statement on good scientific practice and publishing
Published in
Insights into Imaging, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13244-012-0174-z
Pubmed ID
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 17%
Spain 1 17%
Unknown 4 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 67%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 17%
Environmental Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2012.
All research outputs
#19,702,729
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#847
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,035
of 167,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.